Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broadlands bridgend


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- jonny - m t  03:33, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Broadlands bridgend

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod, removed by author. Article is about a non-notable housing estate. Fails WP:RS, WP:N. &mdash;  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 18:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment - I tried to do some elementary cleanup, no opinion as yet on keep vs. delete. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 18:13, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete and merge anything useful to Bridgend -- even in a Wiki-world where every town is notable, this is just a subdivision of Bridgend. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 13:11, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - needs a bit more of a tidy up (better referencing, probably a move to a better title) but it looks like a reasonable start to an article, and is distinct enough as an area to merit an article of its own. Waggers (talk) 12:23, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Mere subdivisions or housing developments are not notable the way towns are.  There are no sources here to indicate the significance of this one.  Mango juice talk 17:51, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - trivial coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 21:51, 15 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.