Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brocas Helm (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  07:04, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Brocas Helm
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Not notable WP:Band - in addition I would say there are copyright  issues with the uncited content that appears in other locations on the www -  difficult to tell where it was first published but the content claims were first published here in 2006 without any citations at all diff ...so.... You  really  can  22:02, 30 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete — Per nom. Fails WP:GNG, and is staggeringly far from WP:MUSICBIO. JFHJr (㊟) 22:07, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Article has been around a long time without any sources or credible assertations of notability. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:09, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. A search shows a few mentions of the band, but nothing significant. I actually slashed (stubbed) the article as unsourced, but I did nothing else in terms of deleting it. Then, Ten Pound Hammer came along, perhaps because there was nothing left in the article (don't know if he looked at the history) and requested speedy deletion. That was apparently declined (rightfully) by an admin who then restored all the material I had deleted, posting a very pleasant comment on my Talk page as he (the admin) thought I hadn't intended to do what I did. Sort of a comedy of misunderstandings because I intended to do precisely what I did. And now here we are. I've left all the unsourced material in the article, not wanting to rock the boat any more than I (sort of) already have.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:35, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 04:42, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 04:42, 1 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable band and it fails WP: GNG, too, as there are no sources, just an external link. Electriccatfish2 (talk) 20:58, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and GNG Cyan  Gardevoir  (used EDIT!) 04:12, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.