Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brock Beukeboom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 21:18, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Brock Beukeboom

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable hockey player in junior league, fails criteria of WP:NHOCKEY as well as the GNG. Favoid (talk) 21:55, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Dao256 (talk) 16:12, 24 September 2011 (UTC)dao256 Dao256 (talk) 22:17, 25 September 2011 (UTC)dao256
 * Keep. Was in requested articles for some time. Legitimate prospect, son of former NHLer. Will be an NHLer someday. If you delete this article, someone will have to remake it soon.
 * Delete Fails to meet WP:NHOCKEY. As for being the son of a former NHLer that falls under notability is not inherited. As for recreation in the future, it can just be undeleted when/if he does truly become notable. Right now what you have said is just a case of WP:CRYSTALBALL. -DJSasso (talk) 20:06, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Can be re-created when he meets NHOCKEY or GNG.  Patken4 (talk) 15:20, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete . fair enough. Maybe his article will be recreated someday. Thank you!
 * I would merge a few sentences on his drafting, trade and current team into a "Personal" section in the Jeff Beukeboom article and redirect there. Rlendog (talk) 18:16, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I added the relevant information to the Jeff Beukeboom, so this can just be redirected to Jeff Beukeboom. Rlendog (talk) 18:45, 26 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:NHOCKEY and claims that he will eventually be notable fail WP:CRYSTAL. No redirect necessary.  &mdash;SW&mdash; comment 23:46, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Even if not necessary, but given that relevant, reliably sourced information about this person is present within an existing article, why would we not redirect this term there? Rlendog (talk) 02:22, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.