Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brockmanism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:56, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Brockmanism

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This political ideology is not notable, there are about 198 google hits and none of the top hits are about a political ideology. This appears to be something made up one day. A new name 2008 (talk) 01:30, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Aside from sourcing problems, there's no significant context: what is it? Why is it "Brockmanism"?  No question that there's no notability.  Nyttend (talk) 01:35, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. JJL (talk) 01:40, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, I speedied this earlier, but let's leave it here for a definitive ruling. No sources indicating that anyone other than the author has ever heard of this.  NawlinWiki (talk) 02:36, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete--poorly written, unsourced, and, frankly, full of unverified nonsensical claims. Drmies (talk) 02:45, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:51, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete and followers should join Ron Paul's party. :-) Steve Dufour (talk) 07:27, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems like a poorly-written proposal for a political system with the intent by the author to gain followers.  That is not what wikipedia is for, and this article in no way meets the notability guidelines, nor does it add anything to Wikipedia.  Theseeker4 (talk) 19:13, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, salt, send the creator into exile. ---  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive' 00:21, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 18:08, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.