Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BrokeNCYDE (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy close. The previous nomination was closed 3 days ago. A new nomination should not follow so soon. If you believe the earlier discussion to be faulty, the correct course of action would be to ask for a deletion review, not opening yet another discussion. Mgm|(talk) 22:46, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

BrokeNCYDE
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete - all references were from myspace, youtube, and blogs. A few loyal fans have prevented its proper deletion in previous AfDs even though it blatantly fails at proving Notability or passing WP:Music. Hooper (talk) 14:59, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - The appearance on MTV's TRL needs to be sourced, but this would establish notability. -- Oliver  Twisted (Talk) (Stuff) 15:36, 29 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete: Fails WP:MUSIC and WP:GNG as there are no reliable, third party sources to establish notability. Article was deleted after first AfD, page recreation resulted in misguided users prevented deletion from second AfD. Page at Brokencyde speedied under A7 seven times. sparkl!sm hey! 15:56, 29 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep - The last AfD was closed a few days ago, AfD is not a case of shoot until you hit. — Realist  2  18:52, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - The last AfD resulted in no-consensus by fault. The only informed user who voted keep, OliverTwisted, provided links that were later proven to fail GNG.  The couple of users who voted keep based on what he said with no real knowledge never returned or saw that. Hooper (talk) 19:13, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * In that case the proper course of action is asking for a deletion review. Realist is quite right in his assessment. No matter how faulty the original outcome, renominating an article days after an earlier close is an abuse of process. - Mgm|(talk) 22:45, 29 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   —sparkl!sm  hey! 16:11, 29 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - not only are they crap, they aren't notable. No sources to confirm notability. Cookie-cutter YouTube celebrities who haven't reached the notability of Tay Zonday or Chris Crocker yet; I doubt a TRL appearance would be a confirmer of permanent notability rather than an indicator of Warholian fame. Sceptre (talk) 19:18, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:MUSIC. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  19:45, 29 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.