Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broken Gopher Ink


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 17:07, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Broken Gopher Ink

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No independent sources, only their own webpage and an article written by Broken Gopher Ink. The only other source is a broken link. Apparently someone or some people called BGI do exist, but not notable. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 21:00, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Ah, and the article was written by an SPA. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 21:05, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 11 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 00:45, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 00:55, 24 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete I was unable to find significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  02:30, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete I was only able to find those sources detailed above. I can't see that this passes either WP:ORGDEPTH or WP:GNG.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 06:16, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per above and fails WP:GNG .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:13, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.