Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broken heart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy keep. MER-C 08:53, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Broken heart

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Due to the nature of the subject, there are no reliable verifiable sources, so the subject matter is not suitable for Wikipedia. Rosemary Amey 04:35, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Plenty of sources are listed on this fairly well written article for a very common metaphor. Discussion of popular metaphors is entirely appropriate for Wikipedia. --Daniel J. Leivick 04:40, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article is reasonably sourced. And the topic is definitely notable. Not to descend into counting ghits, but "broken heart" gets 1,430,000. WJBscribe 04:43, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are plenty of sources, in literature and otherwise. --N Shar 04:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Well-sourced particularly regarding the medical aspects. Also a very widespread subject and metaphor. Krimpet 05:08, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep very notable social/cultural phenomenon, not just a metaphor itself, should be in wikipedia. Wooyi 05:55, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per all of the above. --Candy-Panda 07:27, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable subject, and ridiculous nomination. Wavy G 08:30, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.