Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bronn (character)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of A Song of Ice and Fire characters.  Sandstein  08:15, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Bronn (character)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Consists entirely plot and information from WP:PRIMARY sources, aside an article in The Telegraph which only mentions the character in passing. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NCHARACTER Prisencolin (talk) 04:07, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 04:35, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 04:35, 15 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete The character seems to fail the notability guidelines due to a lack of usable sourcing. The only thing I could find is stuff about the actor who played him. Plus the article relies way to much on an overly detailed narrative tone and would take a fundamental re-write not to. So, I think TNT also applies. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:45, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of A Song of Ice and Fire characters: Outside of plot, there's hardly anything that can inform the reader of something interesting. The Optimistic One (talk) 10:29, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Refirect per above. I concur this fails NFICTION. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 00:45, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect - An article should (when considering GNG) should not be deleted based on lack of secondary sources in the article at that time, but on whether such sources exist. However I struggle to find any appropriate sources, seemingly like Adamant1. -- Ted Edwards  22:07, 19 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.