Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bronzepunk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:28, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Bronzepunk
Yet another alleged x-punk "genre". Like the others, doesn't actually appear to have any works written within the genre. Delete. —Matthew Brown (T:C) 07:05, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete There are no citeable sources and the content is not verifiable. The article contains a list of influencers without any influenced works that have been orginally created. Avogadro94 14:48, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete As with the others. --Ccranium 15:04, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unencyclopedic. NN, OR, UV. - EurekaLott 15:19, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Agreed -- not verifiable. redfox 15:21, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Agreed. UltimateXiphias 23:24, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. rodii 20:56, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Being the author of this article I wish it to be deleted. Piecraft 21:46, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete all this punkcruft. We should have listed all of these into a consolidated AfD. Jamie (talk/contribs) 03:01, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per originator. Endomion 17:49, 24 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.