Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooke Banner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 01:41, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Brooke Banner

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Prod was removed with no reason given. The subject fails to meet WP:PORNBIO/GNG guidelines. EuroPride (talk) 19:58, 3 June 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes PORNBIO with her AVN nominations in different years. She was just known as Brooke initially for several years. Morbidthoughts (talk) 03:11, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Morbidthoughts. Nominations in multiple years satisfy WP:PORNBIO. • Gene93k (talk) 02:46, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per the AVN classifications shown in the reference for the 2005 nominations, the "scene" nominations listed are not considered, by the organization giving the awards, to be nominations for the individual performers. Since notability is not inherited (a musician who plays on a Grammy-winning track, for example, is not automatically notable), these nominations do not satisfy the terms of WP:PORNBIO which are cited as the basis for notability. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:03, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Not to encourage more WP:OSE, but no one is ever "automatically notable", as they must meet criteria for inclusion.... and actually, a musican on a Grammy-winning soundtrack might indeed be found notable if meeting the criteria for ensemble (note that this includes a band, singer, rapper, orchestra, DJ, musical theatre group, etc.) found over at WP:MUSICBIO. But of course... the article under discussion is not about a muscian.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:00, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Morbidthoughts. --80.192.21.253 (talk) 16:50, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Passes PORNBIO. Hullaballoo's bizarre interpretation of the award is both against consensus from previous AfD and factually inaccurate. Scene performers are listed as award recipients, and referred to as award winners after. Since there is a category for best masturbation scene, I'd really love to hear the argument explaining why that isn't an individual award. Horrorshowj (talk) 17:40, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. It's not my interpretation. It's AVN's classification of its own awards, and that should be what controls, even if you think AVN's classifications are "bizarre". Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:44, 10 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep per passing PORNBIO. An AVN award is an AVN award.  We do not dismiss a ball player's notability because it might be based upon his team winning a league title.  A notable award for a group effort is a notable award, none-the-less.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:00, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.