Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooke C. Wells


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 20:21, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Brooke C. Wells

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Delete per Articles for deletion/Margaret J. Schneider/WP:USCJN Snickers2686 (talk) 18:24, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Law. Snickers2686 (talk) 18:24, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. No serious claim to notability apart from being a US magistrate judge, and it's well-settled (WP:USJUDGE) that such a judgeship is by itself insufficient to establish notability. TJRC (talk) 18:28, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Oklahoma and Utah.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:44, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with the above and the cite of wiki rules on judges. No claim to notability here, so I vote delete. Go4thProsper (talk) 01:07, 16 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.