Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooke Greenberg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. getting more like a WP:SNOW here JForget  01:07, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Brooke Greenberg

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete. See WP:ONEEVENT, WP:NOT, and WP:BIO1E. Nothing else to say really... DJ 10:20, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Personally I think we cannot apply the above mentioned criteria to this unusual and really strange case. The sources are sufficient and reliable, the aricle has some room for improvement. --Vejvančický (talk) 13:55, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Quite obviously not NEWS, this is clearly a notable medical case covered by numerous sources over many years. BLP1E is barely even relevant, except maybe to justify a rename of the article. MickMacNee (talk)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- the wub  "?!"  14:24, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable with multiple sources writing about this situation.  I'd say rename, but i'm having trouble thinking of a reasonable rename to suggest.--Cube lurker (talk) 14:47, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable, unique medical case. I agree with the desirability of a rename and reformat, since the interesting thing is the medical condition and not the person. Gruntler (talk) 21:22, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Perhaps the nominator should read the policies he cites. Jeni  ( talk ) 23:09, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, this is a person with an unknown disorder. As such it is not a single event, news or unnonetable.→ 0 4 1 7 4 4  03:00, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - a notable individual who passes WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 15:15, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.