Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooke High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:41, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Brooke High School

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Nothing in article seems to suggest notability of the school. Bitmapped (talk) 00:00, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Comment WP:Notability (Schools) seems to indicate high schools are notable, but I'm not sure I'd call that gospel. Does have a reliable mention here: http://www.theintelligencer.net/page/content.detail/id/552755/Let-the-SSAC-Be-the-Judge.html?nav=511. Guess I'd say a weak keep at this point, but I could be persuaded either way. It's certainly not much of an article at this point. Nwlaw63 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:05, 15 March 2011 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of West Virginia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. This is a U.S. public high school, readily verifiable, hundreds of GNews hits demonstrate ample independent coverage. No reason to deviate from general practice stated at WP:NHS and WP:OUTCOMES that verifiable high school articles are kept. --Arxiloxos (talk) 05:19, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per the usual outcome. There's just the right amount of information in here, basic info and a link, with User:Tedder having made some adjustments.  Mandsford 19:02, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - due to the commonly accepted standard that all high schools are notable per se. Carrite (talk) 05:12, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - high school; notable; plenty of sources available to meet WP:GNG. Expand not delete. TerriersFan (talk) 18:55, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.