Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brookfield Engineering


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) — Theo polisme  11:53, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Brookfield Engineering

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

negative information about the businessBfenglab (talk)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:06, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:06, 1 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep: Article is well-sourced, and thus both passes the GNG and clears WP:GEOSCOPE. That being said, given the specious ground of this AfD, that the AfD is the sole Wikipedia activity of the SPA filing it, and the pretty plain COI violation suggested by the SPA's name, I'm comfortable with terming this a bad faith nomination. The "negative information" is sourced to both the Boston Globe and the Dallas Morning News, there is nothing about the information which is unsourced or violates WP:UNDUE, and the article was neither created as an attack article nor reads like one.   Ravenswing   21:22, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 14:09, 7 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - Passes GNG based upon sources showing in the piece, in my opinion. Needs to be wikified, I will flag for same. Carrite (talk) 15:47, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.