Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brookhaven Instruments


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  00:10, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Brookhaven Instruments

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not appear to meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG. BangJan1999 16:21, 18 March 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio giuliano 18:33, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Science,  and New York. BangJan1999 16:21, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:NCORP. I'm not seeing any significant coverage in sources as I looked for it. Mostly just namedropping or marketing/advert websites. That or database-like repositories for companies. Makes some cool stuff, but WP:INHERITORG applies even if some of those things are popular. KoA (talk) 16:09, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Same as above, none of the references I can locate meet GNG/NCORP criteria for establishing notability. None provide in-depth info on the company.  HighKing++ 18:14, 31 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.