Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooklyn Beckham (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to David Beckham. Closing early per WP:SNOW Mark Arsten (talk) 01:05, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Brooklyn Beckham
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Two previous AFDs resulted in this being redirect to his famous father's article - and nothing has changed. He still fails WP:GNG, he still fails WP:NFOOTBALL, and he still fails WP:NOTINHERITED. He would not be getting any coverage if his parents were super-duper famous, and the coverage he has got is not significant enough to show any independent notability whatsoever. GiantSnowman 13:04, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 13:06, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:20, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:20, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:20, 19 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete redirect per GiantSnowman. Article claims he was playing for Tottenham Hotspur at the age of 4. He has moved between multiple club, been released from QPR, failed a trial and Manchester United and has ended up at Fulham. At the moment this article seems wishful thinking. D but with no prejudice against recreation should he meet WP:NFOOTBALL in the future.Martin 4 5 1  13:35, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Previous AFDs always seemed to end with redirect to Becks père and I see no reason for this one to be any different. Keresaspa (talk) 00:30, 20 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect and protect - per previous AFDs, a lack of significant coverage independent of the subject's parents and a failure to meet WP:NFOOTY for now. Certainly no objection to recreation but I think that should now be a matter of a formal request from an editor in good standing at WP:DRV. Stalwart 111  00:46, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect - per GS, WP:NOTINHERITED is the key issue here, nothing that he has "achieved" would be worthy of GNG without his famous parents. Fenix down (talk) 10:52, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above. – PeeJay 11:58, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect and protect. Completely agree with Stalwart111's assessment above. Finnegas (talk) 19:04, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect and protect. still NN.  I am not suggesting that any of this is not true.  He may well have moved from club to club as this father moved, but only in children's and junior youth teams.  If he achieves something in his own right, the article can be restored, but not before.  Peterkingiron (talk) 21:56, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.