Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooks Williams


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawing per WP:EARLY, some of these could, I admit, have been better researched, thanks to for pointing this out. (non-admin closure)  SITH   (talk)   14:16, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Brooks Williams

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails the notability guideline for musicians and bands and the general notability guideline due to a lack of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. De-PROD-ed by along with several others. I was going to bundle these as nearly all of them cite no reliable sources that suggest they pass WP:BAND aside from database-style entries in AllMusic or affiliated sources and were created by the same user, however I am mindful of avoiding a trainwreck so I am nominating each of them individually.  SITH   (talk)   10:51, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   SITH   (talk)   11:19, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:15, 23 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. Satisfies WP:GNG. One of a spate of prods by the nominator in a short space of time. I indicated when I deproded it that I found coverage, which they haven't asked about. Coverage includes, , , , , , , , , also played quite a bit on BBC radio . --Michig (talk) 17:13, 23 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.