Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broomhill Pool, Ipswich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawing my nomination. Thanks everyone! ~Anachronist (talk) 18:35, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Broomhill Pool, Ipswich

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a public swimming pool having only local historic notability, with no evidence of non-local significant coverage. Created by blocked COI editor. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:54, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  AD  Talk 07:25, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 08:26, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 08:26, 12 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. Significant coverage from the Heritage Lottery Fund, BBC News , the Twentieth Century Society , and in a book published by English Heritage , all independent reliable sources. --Qwfp (talk) 10:33, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Also the Pastscap ref has significant coverage on it.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 21:05, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - between the sources provided by Owfp there is sufficient notability established. Nosebagbear (talk) 23:00, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep page as it now stands is reasonably well-written and supported by solid sources.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:20, 13 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.