Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brother Corbulo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 04:02, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Brother Corbulo

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Fictional character with no secondary sources to establish notability as required by Notability. No out-of-universe content, too detailed to merge.  Pagra shtak  04:02, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * merge what needs to be merged Same as above. At the very least, redirect rather than delete. DGG (talk) 04:14, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * As I replied at Articles for deletion/Commander Dante, the logical merge choice has been deleted. I did not redirect because the character is not even mentioned in the Space Marine page. I can assure you that any redirect attempt on my part would be reverted on that basis.  Pagra shtak  04:27, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   —• Gene93k (talk) 12:45, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions.   —• Gene93k (talk) 12:45, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Transwiki and delete No references independent of Games Workshop to demonstrate notability. --Craw-daddy | T | 12:58, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Independent sources don't cover the subject in sufficient detail. The subject does not meet the WP:GNG.  Protonk (talk) 18:50, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per Five pillars (notability to a real-world audience, unoriginal research, consistent with a “specialized encyclopedia” concerning verifiable fictional topics with importance in the real world) and What Wikipedia is. -- Happy editing!  Sincerely,  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 23:23, 11 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.