Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brothers Line


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. I seem to remember that there have been debates over the notability of recurring pairings in wrestling tag team matches; I also seem to recall that in those cases notability was established by media coverage. If such media coverage for the trio of players noted here emerges, that would be an argument for resurrection via Deletion Review. However, presently, consensus and notability requirements indicate that deletion is the proper course. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 23:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Brothers Line

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This line of Anson Carter, Daniel Sedin, and Henrik Sedin didn't last long enough (one season) for it to justify having its own article. Delete. (There's nothing worth merging that isn't already in the respective players' articles.) --Nlu (talk) 06:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 
 * Redirect to Daniel Sedin or Henrik Sedin. Anthony Appleyard 08:15, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Or just delete. I highly doubt anyone is going to type in Brothers Line in a search. Lines get changed all the time. At most, include the information in the players' individual pages. Flyguy649talkcontribs 15:41, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless sources are cited for the name and notability established. Stifle (talk) 20:26, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, or make it a section under Daniel Sedin, Henrik Sedin, Anson Carter, or Vancouver Canucks. Then what about West Coast express (ice hockey)?
 * &emsp; Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  &emsp; Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 01:34, 21 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - sorry, I'm a huge Canucks fan, but this isn't properly sourced or referenced. I'm not even convinced it's notable, since no one outside of a Vancouver fan will have heard about this.  You can make similar articles for pretty much any team in the NHL - also, delete the above article as well, for the same reasons.  --Haemo 01:38, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Metropolitan90 02:45, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless sources for this term can be found. John Vandenberg 02:50, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Arbustoo 05:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.