Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Browbeat

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 17:06, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)

browbeat
A common mistake is to think that "if it is more than 1 line long, it isn't a dictionary entry". This article very clearly demonstrates the error in that thinking (to those who haven't been to Wiktionary lately and so haven't noticed that many of the entries are a lot more than 1 line long &#9786;). Wiktionary's article about the word had existed for 15 months at the point that this article was created. Also note that the identical text was added to browbeat 2 minutes after this article was created. So somehow I doubt that it was by a different editor, and GFDL considerations don't apply. Uncle G 18:53, 2005 Mar 17 (UTC)
 * Delete, detailed definition duplicating Wiktionary content. -- Infrogmation 20:18, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.