Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brownfield remediation and economic development


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. As correctly noted by AP, there is no prior PROD, treating this as an expired one. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:38, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Brownfield remediation and economic development

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Essay on brownfields and their relation to economic development, sourced only to a deadlink that was at one point a report by the Port of Portland. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:33, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:33, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:33, 14 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Note to closer for soft deletion:? While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd (via summary). --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Further note to closer: I think Cewbot got this one wrong. The diff linked above is not a prod. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 00:12, 22 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.