Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brownge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Delete. Pastor Theo (talk) 00:22, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Brownge

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Prod contested by IP (only edit) without improvements or edit summary. Prod reason: "Neologism that hasn't received any significant attention in reliable independent sources yet. The two external links at the bottom are completely unrelated (and not reliable anyway), leaving us with a video of someone who coined the word. This is insufficient to be included in Wikipedia". Brownge has not received attention in reliable independent sources, with no Google News hits or Google Books results. Fram (talk) 07:17, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: a neologism that doesn't appear to have gained traction; no reliable coverage under the equally charming synonym "brounge" either. Gonzonoir (talk) 12:13, 7 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NEO. This word, under either spelling, does not appear to meet Wiktionary's Criteria for inclusion so don't bother transwikiing it. Note that "Brounge" is seemingly a common OCR error for Brouage, a place in France. Thryduulf (talk) 22:44, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  —Thryduulf (talk) 22:44, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as neologism lacking sufficient reliable sources to establish notability. Cnilep (talk) 19:06, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO. No mention at all that I can see in reliable sources. Also, two links at the bottom seem to be commercial links. If this somehow survives, they likely need to be removed. -- Transity  ( talk &bull; contribs ) 19:07, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO Niteshift36 (talk) 05:18, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.