Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Browser Media


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 10:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Browser Media

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is about a nonnotable web development firm. A google search shows that it fails the notability guidelines as no in-depth analysis has been written on it by independant, reliable, third-party sources. Very little can be found to verify that the firm exists except a few scant press reports. Fails WP:N and WP:WEB. Themfromspace (talk) 10:32, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 10:55, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 10:56, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:55, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete No reliable sources. --Peephole (talk) 20:23, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - nothing I can see that passes the bare WP:CORP requirements. Just another company that we can't write a neutral verifiable article about - Peripitus (Talk) 10:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.