Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brrreeeport


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Pepsidrinka 14:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Brrreeeport

 * — (View AfD)

Non-notable internet meme. Only one reference, and while the google hits are significant (109,000), only the one source has been noted for this meme. Torinir ( Ding my phone  My support calls   E-Support Options  ) 03:28, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologistic forumcruft. No WP:RS indicating that it's notable. -- Kinu t /c  03:42, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as neologism. Only notability was a single link that was recycled twice.  --Dennisthe2 04:20, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 08:00, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:RS, non-notable, WP:NEO. Ter e nce Ong 09:53, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. We really need an official-sounding policy-type thing like "Wikipedia is not for something you invented in a forum one day". -/- Warren 11:11, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:INCREDIBLYSTUPID. --- RockMFR 20:28, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete db-context. Danny Lilithborne 22:03, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete neologism. ← A NAS  Talk? 02:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Robert Scoble. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-30 09:32Z 
 * Strong Delete per nom. How is this discussion still open with some speedy votes? -- Wizardman 06:06, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.