Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce D. Jette (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 12:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Bruce D. Jette
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

After seeing the consensus of the Afd for Jette's successor as United States Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology, this position does not confer notability by itself. Independent sources are just not there. Clarityfiend (talk) 15:17, 28 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Note: I didn't bundle this guy with the three others nominated above because this is his second Afd. I didn't find the 2018 keep verdict particularly convincing. Clarityfiend (talk) 15:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Massachusetts, New Jersey,  and New York.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  20:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 18:35, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sohom (talk) 16:01, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Has coverage in reliable sources. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:06, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * What independent sources are there about him rather than events in which he may have played a part? Clarityfiend (talk) 13:37, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Hawkeye7  (discuss)  18:47, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Passing mention, and two routine non-independent announcements, one by the US Army (duh) and one by the government about his appointment. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:06, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:06, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails GNG due to lack of independent sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpen320 (talk • contribs) 2023-12-12T17:34:14 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The last AFD discussion was convincing when one reads right to the bottom and then follows-up on what MelanieN pointed out five years ago. As explained there, this started off as undeclared paid editing by . Then  and  (an IP address from the Office of the Secretary of Defense) stepped in saying "As the Digital Media Analyst with ASA(ALT), I've been tasked by the Director of External Communications to scrub Dr. Jette's wiki page and use his official Department of Defense bio.". Then after the first AFD discussion in 2018 a single-purpose account  and  and  and  (more OSD IP addresses) got at the article in 2019 and filled it with all sorts of unverifiable stuff like what the innermost thoughts of the article subject, coincidentally who was born in 1954 and worked in acquisition, were at age 5. We should get rid of this entire edit history. There have been no contributions apart from the usual mechanical fiddlings for categories and whatnot by anyone else.  There's no writing here that hasn't either had or outright declared a conflict of interest, and there has been at least one direct statement of intent to violate our fundamental NPOV and verifiability content policies (which latter the article now hugely does &mdash; at least the undeclared paid editor gave a pretense of adhering to the verifiability policy, but the "tasked" people and the people with the coincidental usernames and Pentagon IP addresses haven't even bothered at all to tell readers how they can check, say, what this person did as a football mascot in the early 1970s) by the people who wrote this content. Uncle G (talk) 21:35, 12 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.