Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce De Palma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. WjBscribe 15:26, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Bruce De Palma

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

"Inventor" of a free energy machine. Lack of critical (in the sense of independent review) sources. Guy (Help!) 09:20, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

*Delete, Since the 'book' and it's 'publisher' referenced apparently do not exist. Also, we should try to preserve the 'elite and secretive nature of the game' as mentioned in the article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Killing sparrows Sorry, added to wrong article!--killing sparrows 22:05, 7 April 2007 (UTC)(talk • contribs) 22:02, 7 April 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete. Nothing really turning up in Google site:.edu searchs, nor in Google Books, Google Scholar, or Google News Archives. Bupkis attention, in other words. --Calton | Talk 15:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable in subject area of perp motion. J. D. Redding 05:18, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Internationally well known in the perp motion scene and hence quite notable as crackpots go. The article is passably written, but some statements (e.g. the MIT-Edgerton connection) need sourcing. Stammer 06:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep seems notable enough. Gateman1997 04:14, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep The page needs sourcing but otherwise he is notable (notorious) within his field and so fulfills the relative criteria for inclusion (notable loons are still notable). Note: User requesting peer review sources for his work should be put in a small box and mailed to Afwhatsitstan until they stop asking. perfectblue 14:12, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.