Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Hung


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) sst ✈(conjugate) 00:08, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Bruce Hung

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Questionable notability for this actor, looks like he is just one film as well. Wgolf (talk) 19:19, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - subject lacks notability (only appearing in one film) and is not covered in the media. Meatsgains (talk) 23:34, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  05:23, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  05:23, 19 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as apparently not yet satisfying WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister   talk  06:26, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup the Chinese version of the article seems to have a bit more information. Look up "布魯斯" on google and you'll find a multitude of sources, including a verified Facebook page with over 300k likes.--Prisencolin (talk) 10:03, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry but a Facebook page with over 300,000 likes does not qualify a subject to be significant or notable. Meatsgains (talk) 18:05, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I mean it might.--Prisencolin (talk) 20:32, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Well to be fair-there was no link to the Chinese page on here when I put this AFD up! Wgolf (talk) 20:34, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Keep per the significant coverage in reliable sources.  Here is the article for the magazine on the Chinese Wikipedia, zh:壹週刊 (台灣).  2015-10-18. "布魯斯戀愛ing 不怕被跟拍" (pages 1 and 2). World Journal. Archived from the original (pages 1 and 2) on 2016-01-26. Retrieved 2016-01-26.   <li></li> </ol>There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Bruce Hung (布魯斯) to pass Notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 07:09, 26 January 2016 (UTC)</li></ul> <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: To give editors time to evaluate sources provided by. Pinging users who commented prior to those sources being provided:, and   Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 13:01, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 13:01, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. The sources provided above are largely tabloid but they indicate a sufficiently high level of persistent coverage to confer notability. Deryck C. 22:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.