Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce J. Gebhardt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  20:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Bruce J. Gebhardt

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A nocontent speedy delete has been rejected, because there was an infobox. The page contains exactly the same information as the item in the table of deputies. Xx236 (talk) 07:00, 8 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. See possible references:, , , . As for A3, it only applies if there is no content at all, except external links/cats/see also. To have an infobox is to have content, as useless as it may be. I assume at least a stub could be written using these sources. --  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   07:30, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * This Wikipedia contains pages, not infoboxes.
 * I know it has a content so I don't speedy delete.
 * Unreferenced pseudobiography. Xx236 (talk) 07:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)


 * delete as it fails general notability. --JumpLike23 (talk) 22:50, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:14, 8 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Deputy Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, now that I've realised that it seems a suitable target.... — Smjg (talk) 19:35, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - I fleshed it out a bit. I think it should pass now; deputy directors of the FBI should be notable. Connormah (talk) 18:47, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep – Deputy director of FBI, all others have articles. MB298 (talk) 00:49, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep the number two official at the FBI is a notable figure. Article looks in much better shape now as well. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep thanks to User:Connormah for the expand, source. Plenty more coverage exists, heroes who take down bad guys and same a lot of innocent lives do tend to have the coverage to pass WP:GNG.  In this case, however, Gebhardt had a distinguished and reliably sourced career.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:09, 16 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.