Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce James


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:01, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Bruce James

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:POLITICIAN, just no claim to notability at all. Rusf10 (talk) 03:21, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 05:09, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 05:09, 25 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable politician. SportingFlyer (talk) 07:16, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. As with all of the other glut that are getting cleaned up right now, serving as a county freeholder is not an automatic WP:NPOL pass that entitles a person to have a Wikipedia article just because he can be nominally verified as existing — the article would need to be referenced to enough reliable source coverage about him to get him past NPOL #2 as significantly more notable than most other county councillors in the United States. But the only "reference" here is his own primary source profile on the county council's own website about itself, which isn't cutting it. Bearcat (talk) 16:52, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Strong delete This over coverage of New Jersey politicians has reached the level of absurdity.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:35, 2 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.