Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Mackey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. slakr \ talk / 11:44, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Bruce Mackey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is completely self-promoting!! 10:24, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete does Not promotional however it does fail WP:GNG.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 13:47, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 21 January 2014 (UTC)


 * "Self promoting"?? According to the article the subject passed away in 1997... The nom is therefore completely incorrect., can you tell us how you have ascertained that someone who had a park in Toronto named after him is not notable, per WP:BEFORE? Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 15:48, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 05:30, 29 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Nice gesture, but having a park named after oneself is not enough. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:56, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BIO1E. If the park were notable and had its own article, we could merge this one there, but I suspect it's not notable either. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:21, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per David. - Turtlepump (talk) 16:04, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.