Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Michael Hall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Davewild (talk) 13:24, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Bruce Michael Hall

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This person appears to not have sufficient notability, in particular as an "entertainer", to warrant a Wikipedia article. Merely appearing on certain television shows does not suffice. Was this article created by the subject's publicist?--Rpclod (talk) 02:42, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Rpclod (talk) 02:55, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 15 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - As an unreferenced BLP, this should have been deleted - his twin's article at Seth Hall has much the same problem, with a single ref to YouTube. However, I just did a quick Google, and I do recognise the Underhill photographs - major pin-up images that repeatedly pop up all the time. But being in a famous image is not in itself sufficient for notability. Adam Perry from the Man and Baby poster doesn't have an article, for example. (OK, yes, that's WP:OTHERARTICLESDONTEXIST...) I don't know if the role on Passions is sufficent as it was one of the minor Passions characters but it's an interesting note that one succeeded the other twin in a role. Certainly they should both be mentioned somewhere, but I don't see anything particularly compelling on a quick Google showing that either is notable enough to be on Wikipedia - loads of drooling blogs, as per usual for any hottie (male or female), but that's it. Mabalu (talk) 09:35, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:44, 22 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - The only available sources seem to be fansites and trivial mentions elsewhere. Fails. WP:GNG.- MrX 16:56, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note - I have gone ahead and nominated his twin brother too. Mabalu (talk) 15:35, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.