Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Rappaport


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep, per criterion 2: "unquestionably vandalism or disruption and nobody unrelated recommends deleting it." I will leave it to admins and/or other users in good standing to warn or sanction the nominator. Non-admin closure. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 14:28, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Bruce Rappaport

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

'''Total cheer-leading puffery piece about non-notable banker. Article fails standard Neutrality and Notability guidelines.''' Zachtron (talk) 10:07, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - Totally biased article about non-notable deceased banker. Article written with clear bias as a "cheer-leading puffery piece". Most references are unreliable and fail any type of common neutrality. This individual was a non-notable Joe-blow foreign banker. Article should be deleted immediately without fail!   Zachtron (talk) 10:14, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 May 2.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  11:26, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. Retaliatory‎ tit for tat nomination. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:28, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * (ec) Speedy keep. Rappaport's been a notably bad, bad boy, written about in the New York and Los Angeles Times. Clarityfiend (talk) 12:32, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Obvious retaliatory nomination. Sanction/trout as necessary. -- Kinu  t/c 13:26, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Disruptive nom. --Randykitty (talk) 13:28, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.