Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Roselle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:59, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Bruce Roselle

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Spam article about non-notable author, created by a very determined SPA despite multiple deletions; fewer than 70 non-WP ghits, most of them irrelevant; only hint at notability is a couple of minor awards in obscure promotional competitions andy (talk) 01:18, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Author of two books, neither from an established publisher, and no wonder why: one is in 11 WorldCat libraries, the other in 5. The other material is equally minor,but this is easy to quantitate. DGG (talk) 01:37, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per DGG; per nom; and because there are no reliable sources that are possible. Bearian (talk) 02:24, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 03:40, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I speedied this yesterday as being a copyright violation of the author's self-promotional website and the self-promotional aspect still seems very strongly present.  As well, I have learned to have a great deal of respect for User:DGG's assessment of anything that falls under the heading of library science.  I examined a random sampling of Google hits and found them as irrelevant as the nominator.  Accounting4Taste: talk 17:20, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 11 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.