Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brugs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nobody opposes deletion.  Sandstein  09:11, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Brugs

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unsourced article about a brand of beer, which reads like an advert (it was previously nominated for SD which was not followed through) and provides no meaningful information to justify a Wikipedia article. I've search for available indepth online sources about Brugs with little success - there is this one for example, but it is unclear whether this is the same Brugs brand because the manufacturer is different. Sionk (talk) 10:23, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 8 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Surprisingly limited mentions across the web. Blacklisted site ( http://beer.findthebest.com/l/265/Brugs ) mentions a first brew date of 1566 (without providing a reliable source) and the brand is listed in Heineken Europe's site as one of their brands. But no reliable sources and a paucity of mentions in broad gSearches, gBooks, gNews, etc. Perhaps the beer is limited to distribution in Belgium? Bottom line: fails to meet notability standards.   Geoff  Who, me?  00:14, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.