Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brunel (British postage stamps)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 23:53, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Brunel (British postage stamps)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This stamp issue is not notable in itself. One of hundreds of special issues by the British Post Office. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:11, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 30 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Royal Mail makes too many special issues for any to be worth a WP article. An additon to ther artifcle on Brunel would amount to trivia.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:09, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: No claim to notability made here, just the issuing information don't make this useful or encyclopaedic. Also we are not a stamp catalogue with all those details. The foundation has the wikibooks:World Stamp Catalogue where such details would be far more appropriate. Individual stamp article must have some reliably sourced notability and I don't see any. ww2censor (talk) 02:02, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.