Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruno Chikly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:54, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Bruno Chikly

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Puffed up bio with no real claims to notability, despite the misleadingly large list of references. Article contains a list of articles/book chapters, all in minor journals/books (some in predatory journals) and none of them cited with anything approaching what is needed to establish notability (highest citation count = 38, h-index = 4). Awards are very minor/trivial, the most significant one being included in the "millennium edition of Marquis Who's Who in the World". Most references are to works by the subject himself, no in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 15:07, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:45, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:18, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of passing WP:PROF nor any other notability criterion. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:04, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as too soon at best, still questionable for a solidly notable article. SwisterTwister   talk  23:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.