Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruno Colmant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As noted in the discussion, the best solution here is to start the article from scratch. Tone 19:35, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Bruno Colmant

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unable to determine if notable with terrible references with supposed heavyweight. Fails WP:ACADEMIC, WP:BIO. Heavy awards also, but no refs.  scope_creep Talk  13:30, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:42, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:42, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:48, 16 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - Bears all the hallmarks of an undisclosed CoI article which probably qualifies as a G11 candidate. Colmant has published some papers, but they have not been cited by many, and judging by his page, I doubt he meets WP:NBIO or WP:ACADEMIC. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:24, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:BEFORE revealed published papers, but without many cites and nothing that would be ground-breaking. A WorldCat search revealed many books, with the most popular being stocked in 47 libraries, almost all in France. Some parts of the article definitely read like a promotion, the Media section of the article in particular catching my eye. Could be worth an article but would need to start over.  Denied Club ❯❯❯ talk?  08:55, 21 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.