Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruno Honores


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:HOAX, WP:SNOW. The Bushranger One ping only 17:49, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Bruno Honores

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

While not a blatant hoax, not a single fact in this article can be verified by any search I have been able to perform. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:36, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing found to verify this article (on Google, Highbeam, Questia). In addition, even if the text was verifiable, it is unlikely that the subject would be notable. AllyD (talk) 18:06, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete not verifiable and not notable. Karl 334   Talk-  -Contribs  18:08, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 16 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete as unverifiable. As the nominator states, not a single fact in the article can be verified. Some extraordinary claims with zero proof. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Unless some sources, even non-English sources, come forward I will change my position but at the moment it lacks WP:SIGCOV and WP:V. Mkdw talk 01:46, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unverifiable content. No coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. — Joaquin008  ( talk ) 19:16, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.