Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruno crosier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete as nonsense hoax. Stifle (talk) 20:10, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Bruno crosier

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Complete hoax. No google results for any of the people mentioned in this, and I'm sure if there were enough info floating around for a wikipedia article, it would be all over the net. ARended Winter 22:18, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Bullshit.--Sethacus 22:28, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - No basis in reality, completely unverifiable. I saw this on RC patrol and was waiting for someone else to do the dirty work. Thanks ARW! --Bongwarrior 22:31, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete patent hoax. I was all ready to G1 this, but now the AfD's up may as well let it run. —  iride scent   (talk to me!)  22:43, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I was going to call it something else, but "bullshit" about sums it up.  Completely unverifiable.  Accounting4Taste 00:51, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol_delete_vote.svg|15px]] Delete Sethacus said it best. GlassCobra (Review) 03:47, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Why cite policy when Sethacus's pithy Anglo-Saxonism says so much? Pigman 04:45, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Haha this one is pretty funny, but I don't want to encourage the trolls.   Bur nt sau ce  17:24, 8 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.