Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brunswick Computer Museum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. DS 16:21, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Brunswick Computer Museum
Non-notable museum. The article provides no independent reliable sources asserting its notability and a google search does not reveal any relevant sources either. Mattinbgn\talk 00:58, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.  -- Mattinbgn\talk 00:58, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Delete. I agree, on the basis on the Google results. Shawn in Montreal 01:00, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, nothing in Google News Archive either. Not sure if being housed in a shed is a joke or a dialect issue ... --Dhartung | Talk 01:03, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No reliable sources in the article and it seems it can be found. The shed reference in the article appears to indicate that it is in a shed in its founders house. Capitalistroadster 01:39, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. What more can I add? Pigman 06:08, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'd absolutely love to have an article on the Brunswick Computer Museum, and would have voted keep at even the slightest evidence that this isn't just some dude who has a shed full of computers. Alas. THE KING 09:00, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm having trouble imagining that a real museum, especially one that's all about computers, would have 0 Google hits besides Wikipedia itself. Suspect this is either a hoax or some guy's self-aggrandising name for his shed full o' junk.  Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  12:27, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment, got a chuckle from your "shed full o' junk" phrase. Doctorfluffy 02:53, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per others. The zero ghit link above is really condemning. Doctorfluffy 02:52, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, no reliable sources given to back up the claims made in the article. I find it really hard to believe that a computer museum in someone's shed deserves an article here in the first place. ~  Sebi  04:38, 31 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.