Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brutos Framework


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 11:16, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Brutos Framework

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not notable. There are no independent sources Mdggdj (talk) 12:16, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:30, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom. I can't believe this has been hiding here for seven years. Owen&times; &#9742;  14:36, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article subject does not appear notable, and the entire article as it stands violates WP:NOT with no scope to re-write the current content into a proper encyclopaedia article — MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 23:22, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  18:44, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clearly NOT. Not sure if it's something that Wikibooks allows? 94rain  Talk  02:15, 8 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.