Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan M. Ferguson (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:45, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Bryan M. Ferguson
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable enough to be on Wikipedia. KnightMight (talk) 14:58, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. KnightMight (talk) 14:58, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:45, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment So you just said in Articles for deletion/Bryan M. Ferguson (2nd nomination), closed with no consensus less than a fornight ago. I'm no advocate of the article but if "Not notable" wasn't enough to convince anyone, the redundant addition of "...enough to be on Wikipedia" seems unlikely to swing it this time. You'll have to lay out the specifics as to why the numerous citations don't cut it in your view. Nobody's likely to check them all without a steer from you. Mutt Lunker (talk) 18:46, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 21:22, 31 July 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete more information is not better. Music video creators are very rarely notable, and there is nothing here that suggests an exception to this rule.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:29, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:55, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Already a lengthy article with plenty of sources. Yes, a lot of the sources are interviews, but this still demonstrates that people are talking about the subject. Bringing all this information together into one article is helpful for our readers, improves Wikipedia, and thus this article should be kept. NemesisAT (talk) 21:05, 8 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.