Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan Stone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. --Core desat  03:18, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Bryan Stone


Unconvincing notable accomplishments; article started by subject WP:AUTO CobaltBlueTony 05:00, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non notable, unreferenced, started by a "BPstone" (hmm, maybe Bryan Stone?).   Dooms  Day34  9  05:05, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, this article is autobiographical. And yes there aren't third party sources right now, but there's no particular reason to doubt his Boston University page of publications.  Yes I realize that page is basically self-published and thus not a good source, but he has academic credentials- presentations, articles, and books written over a span of many years.  I'm certainly not saying every college professor in the world should have an article, but I'm gunna say keep on this particular one.  Friday (talk) 05:12, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, he seems to have notable accomplishments. Also, WP:AUTO is not, by itself, a reason for deletion. -Amarkov babble 05:26, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep despite WP:COI. The article could use a touch-up and independent sources. --Dhartung | Talk 05:55, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable person, despite being an autobiography. Article needs to be cleaned up with more sources. --Ter e nce Ong (C 08:33, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Needs sourcing, not deletion. --Falcorian (talk) 19:24, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems to meet both WP:BIO and WP:PROF. --Oakshade 23:24, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.