Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryce Welker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  19:50, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Bryce Welker

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject only mentioned in passing in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 01:32, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 07:17, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:39, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:39, 25 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Does not meet WP:GNG. Most refs are not independent (interviews with subject). Insufficient in-depth coverage in independent RS. Article created by SPA. MB 13:11, 25 May 2017 (UTC).
 * Do Not Delete Did you read the article? There are 7 citations from viable sources. This is not an article which should be included in a deletion conversation. Your notations are entirely subjective. Please include at least 1 specific example of a policy violation.
 * Our arguments for why the article should be deleted are not subjective. It's not a matter of policy violation, Welker just doesn't seem to meet general notability requirements. Meatsgains (talk) 22:26, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

comment author should try to enhance the article Prof.Marlin (talk) 11:35, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * welcome to Wikipedia, whoever you are.Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:43, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete coverage shy of what is required to meet WP:GNG in terms of depth or breadth. There's also an interview and something written by the subject. The things smacks me as being overly promo. Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:43, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Blatant promo. Exemplo347 (talk) 20:03, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - while creation by a SPA editor is not grounds for deletion, it does lead to the creation of promotional articles like this one. Does not meet WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:39, 3 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.