Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brycheiniog (magazine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) v/r - TP 03:24, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Brycheiniog (magazine)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Procedural nomination. User:Neutrality PRODed the article, but I'm not ready to let this one go down without more scrutiny. The Brecknock Society is very old (~1728), and it would very much surprise me that this publication is not notable under WP:NJOURNALS, particularly Criterion 3. However, I haven't heard of it before today, so maybe it's not as notable as appearances may hint. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 21:22, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Added several sources that assert notability and value. Jokestress (talk) 23:02, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Established and respected journal.Martinlc (talk) 16:11, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Now that sources have been added, it seems notable. Keep or merge/redirect into the newly-created Brecknock Society and Museum Friends (which didn't exist at the time I tagged the magazine for proposed deletion) -- either seems appropriate. Neutralitytalk 21:11, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.