Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BubbleTALK


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   18:25, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

BubbleTALK
Contested prod. Bacon, eggs and adspam. Opabinia regalis 00:14, 26 August 2006 (UTC) Week Delete - semi-Notable subject, badly written, but not that notable. -- andrew  04:17, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. You forgot toast and jam. SynergeticMaggot 00:20, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. ♥ FaerieInGrey 00:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete —  The product/innovation is actually intriguing, yet the article author went about it wrong and has created an adspam. However, BubbleMotion, the company that created this service, might just be able to hold up on its own (barring advertspam) with mention of this in it. Just my $0.02 -- moe .RON   talk  00:59, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * "where people can send voice as a message instead of text." Isn't that a phone? Regardless, delete as adspam. It shows scant Google hits anyway, and being innovative is not the same as being notable. Aplomado  talk 01:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - the article itself is poorly written, probably by a non-native English speaker, but subject of the article has been written about by a mjor cell phone manufacturer Ercisson and made it on to Engadget with only a little bit of research. -- Whpq 03:24, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Please allow me to point out to you that there is no official policy on notability. Please view WP:N. However, I agree with you that this article is badly written. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  05:15, 26 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, non-notable product, albeit "innovative". It's easier to use than voice mail, and yes, at least one Singaporean cellular service provider provides it as an extra (not sure whether they still do, that was last year when I heard of their launching this service). Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 11:07, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. teh adspam --W guice 16:05, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete lacks verification in article and reads like WP:SPAM.-- danntm T C 17:45, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete spam that doesn't even bother to explain the difference between this and leaving a message direst to voicemail (a long established service). Nuttah68 20:12, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Congratulations, you've invented the walkie talkie. --Xrblsnggt 02:15, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &mdash; Khoikhoi 05:20, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.