Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bubble Up


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep - notability does not expire, and some sources have evidently been found. —Random832 21:26, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Bubble Up

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Apparently non-notable product. - Jehochman Talk 16:59, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm kinda surprised to see the article in such a poor state, but Bubble Up is an iconic brand with nearly a century of history (it was sold a full decade before 7-up) and which hit its peak in the 60s & 70s. Sources aren't going to be extremely easy to find as its acme was a quarter-century before the web took off, but they do exist example Chicago Tribune article. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:14, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - as per Starblind. I've searched Bubble Up, and it doesn't come up with much, but that doesn't mean it should based on that relevance. It supposedly notable per some literary sources I have, at least I think so. &mdash; Rudget contributions 17:59, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep -- as per above. I just did some newspaper archive searching, and came up with the following, from a 2004 Dallas Morning News article:
 * "The Bubble-Up brand has been around since 1917, when Sweet Valley Products Co. of Sandusky, Ohio, started bottling a "non-alcoholic, non-cereal, maltless beverage" under that name. The familiar citrus Bubble-Up - "Kiss of Lemon-Kiss of Lime" - was popular by the 1930s, the golden age of soda pops. The brand had a brief moment of glory in the 1950s when it came out in a 16-ounce bottle, beating both Coke and Pepsi, who were battling it out in 12-ounce bottles.
 * But the brand lost its fizz and all but vanished during the 1960s, according to soda pop guru Hamilton Rousseau, who owns Ifs Ands & Butts."

I'll add the source(s) to the article. Also, fer cryin' out loud, it was just created today; give it a chance. -- phoebe/ (talk) 19:58, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Too important to get rid of.Oh Snap (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.