Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bucardo (PostgreSQL)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:39, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Bucardo (PostgreSQL)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable software. No good sources in article and couldn't find any. Prod contested with "Remove delete: is notable, has sources". Christopher Connor (talk) 19:29, 18 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete: I guess the most notable secondary source is this OSNews article that suggests using Bucardo for upgrading PostgreSQL without downtime. Then there are two paragraphs in an EnterpriseDB white paper. The rest are primary sources (conference presentations), and blog entries. -- intgr [talk] 21:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.