Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bucay, Ecuador


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. T. Canens (talk) 17:02, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Bucay, Ecuador

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article has no sources, and is mostly written like an advertisement. Evking22 (talk) 19:10, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep It seems to exist [] as a populated place and therefore meets WP:GEOLAND MB 03:48, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - It does seem to be a real designated place.  There's nothing particularly advertising-looking in the article and even if there was that would be a matter of regular editing, not deletion. --Oakshade (talk) 05:01, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. "No sources" in the article is a valid reason for tagging the article with refimprove or the like, but it is not a valid reason for deletion.  And there is obligation to do some research on the topic, before nominating an article for deletion. -- do  ncr  am  05:13, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep deletion is not the appropriate outcome. Lepricavark (talk) 22:49, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep An article that needs work needs work but does why should it get deleted if it meets WP:GEOLAND "Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low. Even abandoned places can remain notable, because notability encompasses their entire history. One exception is that census tracts are usually not considered notable." --Jersey92 (talk) 03:26, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Populated location. The article needs improvement but it doesn't need to be deleted. --  Dane  talk  10:41, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep, or merge into General_Antonio_Elizalde_Canton or vice-versa. Bearian (talk) 14:03, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ecuador-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.